|
Recent changes adopted by the Oregon University System
further streamline the process for system approval of new academic
programs. The most significant change
is that OUS no longer requires a pre-proposal round of review. In lieu of a pre-proposal, the Provost at
each institution is required to notify the OUS academic Council that his or her
institution plans on submitting a proposal for a new academic program.
The change at the OUS level allows the University of Oregon to
modify internal review so as to further streamline the approval process as well
as to achieve uniformity for both undergraduate and graduate program proposals.
In order for the Provost to be informed and prepared for new
program proposals, our internal process begins with submission to the Office of
Academic Affairs of a synopsis of the proposed program (degree or certificate) following
approval by the appropriate Dean. The
synopsis should be concise and prepared according the guidelines in the attached
outline.
All proposals should be prepared according to the OUS
guidelines and format. For all new
programs except Certificates use the OUS proposal outline. Proposals for new for-credit Certificate
programs should be prepared using the OUS Certificate outline.
The steps in the internal UO approval process are shown in
the attached flow chart.
The primary review bodies
are the Undergraduate Council for all programs involving undergraduate
education and the Graduate Council for all programs involving graduate
education. The Committee on Courses
reviews and must approve all new courses, reports approval of new courses to
the UO Senate and prepares the Catalog copy.
Upon final approval of a new academic program, the Committee on Courses
includes notice of the program in its curriculum report to the UO Senate.
|